Our consultants are often called
upon to help develop or pursue winning litigation strategies
involving credit card industry disputes. We have provided expert
opinions on topics such as contract interpretation, intellectual
property rights, pricing, receivables valuation,
conversion marketing efforts and more.
Examples of ACG Litigation Support projects include
the following:
- When a credit card issuer sold a portfolio that
included assets subject to an affinity relationship, the affinity
group claimed that it was entitled to a share of the premium
on the sale. ACG investigated contractual provisions and applied
proprietary valuation models to assist the bank in successfully
defending itself.
- One of the largest Canadian card issuers
was being sued by an individual for improper use of intellectual
property. The individual had presented a concept to the bank,
which later issued a product with similar features. ACG identified “prior
art” as well as pointed out significant differences
in product designs. Our testimony helped the bank successfully
defend itself in court.
- A major card issuer hired ACG
to provide expert witness support for a lawsuit regarding
transition marketing following a co-brand contract dissolution
and portfolio sale. ACG
provided extensive support regarding best practices and industry
standards in consumer card marketing. We also designed and
executed a consumer survey that clarified cardholder perceptions
of the contested marketing material. ACG’s client was
pleased with the terms of the pre-trial settlement.
- ACG served as an expert witness in a contract
dispute pertaining to the Canadian credit/charge card market.
The dispute was valued at several hundred million dollars
due to the withdrawal of a primary partner from a coalition
loyalty program. ACG testified to the empirical and projected
performance of the program without this key redemption partner.
The case was settled after the trial began, with our client,
the plaintiff, receiving substantially better terms.
- ACG was engaged by a bank involved
in a contract dispute with a vendor. The bank had purchased
an instant application approval tool that included sophisticated
fraud-prevention techniques. The tool, which the vendor ultimately admitted
did not work as expected, caused heavy fraud losses. The
litigation addressed the damages that resulted from the bank’s
reliance on the vendor's product. Our client was awarded
a settlement without proceeding to trial.
|